I also assume compliance is not an issue, and the child is not receiving concomitant medications such as antacids or H2 blockers that could affect drug exposure. I also agree that the role of venetoclax in this context is questionable and would not recommend its use.
The impact of ASXL1 mutation at diagnosis on treatment response in pediatric patients remains to be established.
Although the BSA is not provided, based on the child’s weight and height, I estimate it to be approximately 0.7–0.9 m², depending on the calculation method. If the dasatinib dose is below 60 mg/m²—the standard pediatric dose—consideration could be given to increasing it. An increase to 80 mg/m² may be also considered. In the pediatric phase 2 study of dasatinib (J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1330–1338), the 80 mg/m² cohort was closed early due to lack of efficacy in patients with blast crisis or accelerated phase disease, but the dose was found to be safe.
In this case, I would consider switching to either ponatinib or asciminib. For a young child like this patient, the pediatric formulation of asciminib currently being studied in a phase 1/2 trial (NCT04925479) would be ideal, though I suspect it may not be available in your region. Novartis may be able to provide the drug through their compassionate use program, and I would be happy to help facilitate that connection.
Ponatinib is not currently approved for pediatric use, but a few studies have demonstrated its safety (Br J Haematol. 2020 Apr;189(2):363–368; Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;136:107–112). If you are able to obtain the medication off-label, I would consider using it. There is also a pediatric phase 1 study of ponatinib (NCT03934372), although it is limited to Europe.
Nobuko Hijiya
Pediatric Oncology
Columbia University, New York, USA