This is a rare adolescent CML case because i) relapse after initial presentation as CML-BP occurred rather late and because ii) relapse presented as CML-CP. Nevertheless, I have observed such cases before [published as EBMT abstract: Claviez A, Klingebiel T, Peters C, Kalwak K, Kabisch H, Viehmann S, Harbot, J, Schrappe M, Suttorp M: Outcome of transplantation in six children presenting initially as Ph+ ALL and with first relapse as Ph+ CML (Abstract). Bone Marrow Transplant 27 (Suppl. 1): S145 (2001)].
Given the young age of the patient and the background of an inital presentation as CML-BP there is now is a clear indication for SCT (Answer to question 1). In addition, the TKI treatment should be restarted after SCT for another 2 – 3 years with 3-monthly monitoring.
To bridge the time until the SCT from the haploidentical sibling as donor will be organized, I recommend to continue dasatinib treatment. In case of no response (no decline of leukocytosis), ponatinib would be the alternative (Answer to question 4).
For monitoring the uncommon e1a3 transcript, I would talk to the scientists in the lab and ask them if they could establish a quant.-RT-PCR assay for this special case. Alternatively, the chromosomal fusion point on the DNA-level could be identified and the treatment efficcacy monitored with a DNA probe providing high sensitivity [Krumbholz M, Goerlitz K, Albert C, Lawlor J, Suttorp M, Metzler M. Large amplicon droplet digital PCR for DNA-based monitoring of pediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia. J Cell Mol Med. 2019 Aug;23(8):4955-4961.] As a rather insensitive method, interphase FISH (~1-2% sensitivity) from periheral blood is also possible (Answer to question 2).
NGS in CML has much improved our understanding of its genetic complexity (additional mutations associated with disease progression, therapy resistance, clonal evolution, identification of rare BCR::ABL1 fusion variants and cryptic rearrangements). For MRD monitoring, NGS will detect evolving resistance patterns, thus allowing optimization of targeted therapeutic strategies. However, data interpretation, not fully established standardization, and cost constraints would prevent me from using this method right now in the case under discussion (Answer to quesion 3). [For a more detailed review see; Sutanto H, Pratiwi L, Romadhon PZ, Bintoro SUY. Advancing chronic myeloid leukemia research with next-generation sequencing: potential benefits, limitations, and future clinical integration. Hum Genet. 2025 May;144(5):481-503. doi: 10.1007/s00439-025-02745-x. Epub 2025 Apr 21. PMID: 40257486].
All my best wishes for your patient!
Meinolf