Translate page

× To share and enhance best practice management of CML, experts and interested clinicians can discuss difficult or interesting CML patient cases here. Clinicians submit a brief history of the patient and the case for discussion (no more than 200 words) by posting it in this forum ("+ NEW TOPIC" button below).

Each clinical case will be forwarded to the iCMLf expert clinical panel for a brief independent response. Consideration should be given to patient confidentiality. Details that are not critical to the case can be changed to preserve anonymity.

As a full clinical history is necessary for accurate comment, cases and comments on the Forum are only accepted from clinicians. If individual patients have a specific question we encourage them to contact their healthcare provider.

DISCLAIMER: The iCMLf does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, or opinions, and disclaims any representation, warranty, or guaranty as to the same. Reliance on any information provided in this Forum is solely at your own risk.

BCR-ABL monitoring from bone marrow post allo HSCT

  • Ulrich Duffner
  • Ulrich Duffner's Avatar Topic Author
2 weeks 2 days ago #1765 by Ulrich Duffner
Hi,
this is a question about a 17 year old boy now day +239 post allo BMT for TKI resistant CML .

Here are post BMT results for BCR-ABL t(9;22) RT-PCR:

+ 1 month: PB negative, BM 0.0072
+2 months: PB N/A, BM 0.0044
+3 months: PB negative, BM 0.0025
+5 months: PB N/A, BM <0.002
+8 months: PB N/A, BM 0.0042

When would you repeat another BM exam for confirmation of the slightly higher BCR-ABL level ?
How worrisome is the positive signal in bone marrow at this timepoint after BMT and at what BCR-ABL level would you consider TKI treatment meant or DLI ?
Our patients most recent STR chimerism from BM was 99.77 %.

Many thanks,
Uli
  • Meinolf Suttorp
  • Meinolf Suttorp's Avatar Topic Author
1 week 3 days ago - 1 week 3 days ago #1768 by Meinolf Suttorp
Replied by Meinolf Suttorp on topic BCR-ABL monitoring from bone marrow post allo HSCT
This case comprises a 17 year old boy who underwent allo-SCT (no info on conditioning, no info on donor matching) because of treatment-resistant CML 7 months ago (no info on duration of treatment since diagnosis of CML, no info of treatment applied prior to SCT). There is no info on the course of disease or any treatment post SCT (acute or chronic GvHD? still on immunosuppression? any TKI treatment post SCT?).
MRD has been assessed regularly and is positive and fluctuating at a level of lower than MR4 in the bone marrow. No data on MRD derived from analysis of the peripheral blood is availiable (does the abbreviation N/A stand for: not available? not applicable? not assessed). There is no info on the quality of the PCR applied (type of reference gene, number of copies of reference gene, number of copies of BCR-ABL1) and there is no info whether the methodology applied followed the IS criteria. That is why it is hard to interpret the measurments of a transcript ratio <0.002 at month 5 and another measurement of 0.0042 at months 8.
On this background my advice would be not to perform another BM analysis right now (to confirm a doubling of the ratio from 0.002 to 0.004) but to continue bone marrow assessment in 3 month intervals and consider intervention by a TKI only once MR4.0 should be lost.
Last edit: 1 week 3 days ago by arlene.
  • Ulrich Duffner
  • Ulrich Duffner's Avatar Topic Author
1 week 3 days ago - 1 week 2 days ago #1770 by Ulrich Duffner
Replied by Ulrich Duffner on topic BCR-ABL monitoring from bone marrow post allo HSCT
Thank you very much Professor Suttorp for sharing your thoughts. Regarding the questions you stated in your answer I would like to add the following additional information.

This boy was initially treated with dasatinib he achieved hematologic and cytogenetic remission but never molecular. After 15 months BCR-ABL was 1.9 % and it was decided to move to allo BMT. At that timepoint dasatinib was switched to nilotinib and after more 2 more months before start of conditioning BCR-ABL was at 1.4 %.

Because of an underlying Gilbert syndrome a non busulfan based conditioning consisting of 12 Gy fractionated TBI, 100 mg/kg cyclophosphamide and ATG (6 mg/kg Thymoglobulin) was given. A bone marrow graft from a 9/10 MUD (bidirectional B mismatch) was used. MMF was stopped at day +30 and tacrolimus stopped after a 7 week taper on day +120. No evidence of GvHD. No TKI treatment post BMT.

This BCR-ABL assay uses FDA approved Quantidex qPCR BCR-ABL IS Kit to quantify BCR-ABL1 major breakpoints fusion transcripts (type e13a2 and/or e14a2) on the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Dx Real-Time PCR Instrument. The ratio of BCR-ABL1 major to ABL1 is calibrated and reported to the baseline of 100% on the International Scale (%IS). The analytical sensitivity of this assay has been determined at 0.002%IS (MR4.7).

"N/A" in my posting above means BCR-ABL was not done from peripheral blood at these timepoints. At +1 month and +3 months BCR-ABL was negative in peripheral blood.
I hope this information clarifies the questions you had. Please let me know if additional information is needed. Many thanks again for sharing your experience.
Last edit: 1 week 2 days ago by arlene.
  • Nick Cross
  • Nick Cross's Avatar Topic Author
1 week 1 day ago - 1 week 1 day ago #1772 by Nick Cross
I would suggest that there is no need for any further bone marrows, monitoring from peripheral blood is fine. In the great majority of cases there is no difference in MRD levels between blood and marrow, providing you are testing total leukocytes as recommended and not MNCs. The change from 0.002 to 0.004 is an insignificant change within the range of experimental error.
Last edit: 1 week 1 day ago by arlene.
Moderators: Melissa Davis-Bishop