×
To share and enhance best practice management of CML, experts and interested clinicians can discuss difficult or interesting CML cases here. Physicians submit a brief history of the patient and the case for discussion (no more than 200 words) by posting it in this forum ("New Discussion" button below). Please include the country of origin.
Each clinical case will be forwarded to the expert clinical panel for a brief independent response. Consideration should be given to patient confidentiality. Details that are not critical to the case can be changed to preserve anonymity. Please consider including your email with the case. This will not be posted on the website, but is useful should further details be requested by the moderator.
As a full clinical history is necessary for accurate comment, cases and comments on the Forum are ONLY ACCEPTED FROM PHYSICIANS. If individual patients have a specific question we encourage them to contact their healthcare provider. General questions can be emailed to info@cml-foundation.org.
DISCLAIMER: The iCMLf does not recommend or endorse any specific tests, physicians, products, procedures, or opinions, and disclaims any representation, warranty, or guaranty as to the same. Reliance on any information provided in this Forum is solely at your own risk.
I would probably hold off on the TKI until there has been some response to IVIG or rituximab. Usually, we can see a response relatively quickly in these patients. If the patient is still transfusion dependent, I would avoid a TKI in case it might cause some degree of myelosuppression.
There is a lot of good advice here. We can break down the problem as follows. The limiting feature here is the ITP. IM makes this worse and there is really no advantage to changing the TKI. ITP must be controlled first. Even an allograft would likely be ineffective as the ITP could easily have its target in donor cells., unless there is a specific host target. Go with the ritux and if no response splenectomy, although the latter may be faster and have better success, and I would actually favor it. Try to continue with IM with plt support. If splenectomy is done, the success would be known immediately as there would be a positive post transfusion plt increment and less risky CML therapy could be continued. The mechanisms of thrombocytopenia are different - destruction in the case of ITP and probable absence of normal stem cells in the case of IM and the solution is to dissect the treatments.
First of all, this case discussion forum is dedicated to CML and not, ITP, and most of the experts are not strongly involved in internal medicine.
Second, as this patient has a non-adherent behavior, I would make sure that "resistance" to steroids and eltrombopag is true resistance and not non-adherence.
Third, make sure that it is pure ITP and not ITP associated with a more global autoimmune disease, such as lupus or sarcoidosis, as the treatment options will differ.
Four: If pure ITP and true resistance, discuss with internal medicine specialists. There are cheap and safe options, such as disulone (if no G6PD deficiency), before considering higher-dose Revolade, Nplate, or rituximab (usually, the response rate is quite poor with ritux). Alternatively, immunosuppressive drugs may be considered. Splenectomy would require making sure that platelet destruction takes place 100% in the spleen (by nuclear medicine imaging), otherwise it will be inefficient and harmful.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.View our Privacy Policy